Brexit: Theresa May scraps £65 fee for EU citizens


Media playback is unsupported in your machine

Media captionTheresa Could says charges axed for EU residents wanting to remain in UK

Theresa Could has scrapped the £65 payment tens of millions of EU residents have been going to should pay to safe the fitting to proceed residing within the UK after Brexit.

She additionally vowed to hunt modifications to the Irish backstop from the EU.

However she once more rejected calls to rule out a “no deal” Brexit – and warned one other EU referendum may threaten the UK’s “social cohesion”.

Conservative rebels and Labour accused her of being in denial concerning the scale of opposition to her Brexit deal.

MPs are attributable to vote on the PM’s modified Brexit deal subsequent Tuesday, after her unique plan was defeated final Tuesday by a record-breaking 230 votes within the Home of Commons.

The BBC’s Assistant Political Editor Norman Smith mentioned there was no signal that Mrs Could was about to desert her Brexit deal and, certainly, she believes that with additional reassurances on the on the backstop she will win over the DUP and Tory Brexiteers.

She provided little new by way of the substance of her deal in her Commons assertion, however pledged to work together with her backbench critics to take contemporary proposals to Brussels.

When will the Brexit payment be scrapped?

Tens of millions of EU residents residing within the UK should apply for “settled standing” to stay in Britain after Brexit.

Candidates should have lived within the UK for 5 years and had been anticipated to pay a payment of £65 every.

“Settled standing” provides EU residents the identical entry to healthcare and schooling after Britain leaves the EU.

Mrs Could instructed MPs she had listened to the considerations of EU residents, by means of their marketing campaign group the 3million, concerning the charges, and they’d be waived when the scheme was launched on 30 March.

The federal government launched a pilot scheme this week for folks to use for go away to stay, by means of a smartphone app.

Mrs Could mentioned anybody “who has, or will, apply throughout the pilot section” can have their payment reimbursed, with additional element to be introduced shortly.

The transfer was welcomed by Labour chief Jeremy Corbyn.

What did Mrs Could say about one other referendum?

She instructed MPs: “Our obligation is to implement the choice of the primary one.

“I worry a second referendum would set a tough precedent that would have vital implications for the way we deal with referendums on this nation.

“Not least, strengthening the hand of these campaigning to break-up our United Kingdom.

“It could require an extension of Article 50. We’d very probably should return a brand new set of MEPs to the European Parliament in Could.

“And I additionally imagine that there has not but been sufficient recognition of the best way second referendum may harm social cohesion by undermining religion in our democracy.”

What concerning the backstop?

The prime minister mentioned she would have additional talks with Northern Eire’s DUP and others on their considerations concerning the Irish backstop.

She’s going to then “take the conclusions of those discussions again to the EU”.

Mrs Could was requested by Tory Brexiteers and Northern Eire’s DUP, who she must persuade to face an opportunity of getting her deal by means of, to decide to looking for legally binding modifications to the part of her EU withdrawal deal coping with the backstop.

She mentioned she was exploring potential “motion” on the backstop that would safe the backing of a majority of MPs, particularly considerations that it may develop into everlasting and threaten the integrity of the UK.

What was Labour’s response?

Media playback is unsupported in your machine

Media captionJeremy Corbyn says PM’s discuss supply was a “PR sham”

Mr Corbyn accused Mrs Could of being in “deep denial” concerning the scale of opposition to her “undeliverable” deal, which was rejected by 230 votes in a Commons vote final week.

He mentioned Labour would again an modification subsequent week that may rule out the “catastrophe” of a no-deal Brexit – and he challenged her to verify that she would do this if MPs voted for it.

He rejected her “phoney” supply of cross-party talks to discover a manner ahead.

Mr Corbyn needs to power a common election and, having received it, negotiate a cope with Brussels that may see the UK in a everlasting customs union with the EU with sturdy ties to the only market and assured protections for staff rights and environmental requirements.

If he cannot safe a common election he has not dominated out getting behind calls for one more referendum.

Could guarantees extra ‘versatile’ strategy

Media playback is unsupported in your machine

Media captionBrexit: Theresa Could on ‘six key points’ in EU talks

The prime minister attacked the Labour chief for refusing to participate in talks together with her on the best way ahead.

She promised to take a extra “versatile, open and inclusive” strategy to involving MPs, and the Scottish and Welsh governments, in negotiating a future relationship with the EU – as soon as her Brexit deal has been accepted.

Labour’s Yvette Cooper, who’s a part of a cross-party group planning a transfer to delay Brexit if there isn’t any new cope with Brussels by 26 February, requested why MPs couldn’t be given a higher say now.

“Why not put to Parliament some votes on her purple traces, together with a customs union, in any other case how can any of us imagine a phrase she says?”

Mrs Could mentioned MPs would be capable to desk amendments to subsequent Tuesday’s vote, “which can mirror totally different views”.

Conservative insurgent Sarah Wollaston, who backs one other referendum, tweeted that it was “like final week’s vote by no means occurred”.

Why does the Irish backstop matter?

Media playback is unsupported in your machine

Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Actuality Examine unpacks the fundamentals

Underneath Mrs Could’s deal, if there may be not a commerce deal or different settlement between the UK and the EU when the transition interval ends, the backstop kicks in.

It could see Northern Eire staying aligned to some guidelines of the EU single market.

It could additionally contain a short lived single customized territory – successfully maintaining the entire of the UK within the EU customs union – except each the EU and UK agree it’s not needed.

However this has been an enormous concern for a lot of Conservative MPs and the DUP, who’ve supported Mrs Could’s authorities for the reason that 2017 election.

Eradicating or amending the backstop may present Mrs Could with sufficient backing from Brexiteer Tory MPs and the DUP to get an settlement handed.

How may MPs take management of Brexit?

Mrs Could’s authorities is engaged in a battle with MPs over who controls the Brexit course of, after her cope with the EU was defeated by a record-breaking 230 votes final Tuesday.

MPs try to make use of numerous Parliamentary ways to inform Mrs Could what to do – or power by means of alternate options to her Brexit deal.

They’ll do that by tabling amendments – advised modifications – to a authorities movement, which is because of be voted on subsequent Tuesday. Or by proposing new legal guidelines of their very own.

One group of MPs, headed by Labour’s Yvette Cooper, with backing from Remainer Conservative MPs, is planning to desk a invoice that may delay the UK’s deliberate departure date from the EU if the federal government shouldn’t be capable of get its deal by means of by 26 February.

Personal Members’ Payments – legal guidelines proposed by MPs who are usually not within the authorities – could be handed however there’s usually solely very restricted time to debate them. The federal government often controls the agenda – what will get debated in Parliament.

Some MPs now need to droop the traditional guidelines to permit time to debate and vote on a invoice that may rule out a no-deal Brexit.

That may not be sufficient although. If the invoice will contain spending cash it additionally wants a “cash decision”. That must be proposed by the federal government.

So MPs face one other impediment in the event that they need to take management of the Brexit course of.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here